|
Let Us Protect Your Rights...
Here is what to do if your are contacted by law enforcement:
In public: "I would like
to go about my business. If I am free to leave, I request to do so."
If you are told that you have
the right to an attorney before questioning: "I do not wish to appear
uncooperative but I refuse to answer any questions without my attorney present.
My law firm is the Law Offices of Triessl and Morris at 818.990.5551."
If you are asked for consent
to search: "I do not consent to any searches of my person, property
or vehicle."
If you are asked for entrance
into your home: "You do not have permission to come into my home."
If you are over 21 and are stopped
on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs:
"I will not take any field sobriety tests and I will not take the PAS test
(the preliminary alcohol screening test)."
If you are under 21 and are
stopped on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs:
"I will not take any field sobriety tests." You are not permitted
to refuse the PAS test.
If you arrested for DUI:
The officer must give you the option to take either a breath or blood test.
A urine test may be among the test choices if the officer suspects that
you are under the influence of a controlled substance. You must submit
to one of these tests: you do not have the right to an attorney when making
this choice or at any time before or during the test.
Let Triessl and Morris Protect Your
Rights!
|
Triessl & Morris Thoughts & Views Blog...
STARBUCKS FRIENDS
So, I’m torn. A new Starbucks opened right down the street.
It’s convenient. There’s great parking. No one has made the switch yet
so I don’t have to budget an extra 15 minutes into my morning if I want
a **!!@@#&& skinny vanilla latte before court. In short, it’s lovely.
However.
I have been going to "my" Starbucks for about seven years. And, after
a brief interlude with Coffee Bean when I was upset by the utter commercialism
and cliché of Starbucks and decided that I was more of a Coffee Bean
person, I realized.
I have Starbucks friends.
Now mind you, I don’t socialize with these people outside of my brief
morning stints at Starbucks. I don’t send them holiday cards. I don’t
invite them to my kids’ birthdays. They don’t know my husband.
But they know a lot.
They lived with me through both my pregnancies (don’t worry I drank
decaf then). They are interested in my job and in what I do. We discuss
politics and current events. When one of them was sick with clinical
depression I entered his cell phone number into my phone and checked
up on him periodically.
They are my Starbucks friends. And I’m loyal.
HOW CAN YOU MORALLY JUSTIFY DOING CRIMINAL DEFENSE WORK?
I get asked this a lot by people and they aren’t necessarily conservative
Republicans.
We live, thank goodness, in a country where people arrested are presumed
innocent, not in a police state. (People v. White (1954) 43 Cal.2d 740,
745, fn. 2). This presumption means that the state must prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that the person arrested is guilty: IT IS THEIR JOB
TO PROVE IT. The attorney client privilege means that anything that
is told to me is totally confidential. (People v. Ledesma (2006) 39
Cal.App.4th 641, 694).
So, even if I know certain things, that doesn’t mean that everyone else,
including the prosecutor, gets to hear about it. The prosecutor has
to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt independent of what I know.
The police have to do everything appropriately and properly, not searching
and seizing anything they want to without regard for the bounds of the
law. That’s why if I get a case dismissed, I get it dismissed because
the state couldn’t prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, not because
of a "technicality."
There is nothing immoral about what I do every day. I actually am the
most legally moral since I make sure that everyone does what they are
supposed to do within the law.
DOES THE SEX OF MY ATTORNEY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
We believe that the fact of our sex works to our advantage in handling
your case. We find that we are more compassionate, more caring, more
global thinking in terms of your family situation. We find that due
to this, we are able to more passionately and zealously represent you
throughout your criminal case. (People v. Perez (1979) 24 Cal.3d 133,
148).
Also, there are certain cases where you should truly consider the sex
of your attorney as an important factor. If you are a man charged in
the rape of a woman or domestic violence against a woman, think about
hiring a woman. If you are a woman, charged in a child abuse case against
her kid, think about hiring a woman.
WE DON’T WANT YOU TO HIRE US IF YOU DON’T THINK THAT WE’RE THE
ATTORNEYS FOR YOU.
We’re serious here. You must be completely and totally comfortable and
happy with the criminal defense attorney that you select to represent
you throughout your case. And if we’re not the ones, don’t hire us.
There are only a few protected relationships recognized by California.
Wife and husband. Priest and penitent. Psychotherapist and patient.
Attorney and client. You are hiring someone that you can tell everything
to. You have to be comfortable and happy.
Do not hire someone that you are not completely sure about. And remember,
money shouldn’t be the driving decision: it’s important, to be sure,
but it shouldn’t be the only factor.
If it is, you won’t be comfortable and happy.
WHAT IS A CRIMINAL DEFENSE "MILL"?
I worked for a couple and it’s not fun. Waking up at 4 a.m., driving
to Needles, driving to Barstow. Believe me, I don’t mind driving to
those places, when I’m not working for a mill.
A criminal defense mill is a law firm who is in the business not of
developing good relationships so that clients will come back if the
need should arise again but of taking as many cases as possible and
resolving them as quickly as possible so that the cycle can repeat:
money in, case out, money in, case out, money in, case out. Think of
the term "run of the mill." Two meanings: the running of the mill, the
day to day grind. The second, average, whatever.
We are not a mill. We work a case for as long as we need to, in the
best interest of the client. And if the need arises in the future, we
get the phone call due to our handling of the last case. We take pride
in the referrals we get because we know that we are getting that phone
call for a reason.
Gives new meaning to "run of the mill," doesn’t it?
I AM A TYPE A PERSONALITY: I WANT TO HAVE ALL THE CONTROL. HOW
DO I RELAX NOW THAT I AM GOING THROUGH THIS?
It is time to sit in the back seat and let us drive. We know that it
is very difficult for you to let go. But we also know that you need
to conduct your affairs, your business and your family while this case
is going on. Be Type A in your affairs. But with your case, let us show
our A. You ride in the back. We tell our clients to give us 95% of the
stress of the case because we can take it. You have enough stress as
it is.
You, as the client, are not objective: we are. This happened to you.
We can look at the whole picture with a bird’s eye view, seeing it globally
and determining what to do based upon everything and based upon our
knowledge and experience in criminal law.
We are wonderful at keeping you abreast of what is happening at every
moment in your case and we always take your calls and questions with
pleasure. And you can rest assured that you have hired attorneys that
you are comfortable and happy with and who will, at every step, protect
your interests and only your interests.
Should you feel that your case is interfering with your life, if you
are overly stressed and anxious to the point where you are not experiencing
life as you normally do, if you have sleeping or eating disturbances
or if you feel that you are just going through the motions of life without
feeling any joy, think about calling your physician to assist you through
this difficult time.
IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE THAT WHEN THERE IS A HUNG JURY THE D.A.
CAN RETRY ME: WHY IS THAT?
Don’t get me started. It is totally against common sense, in my opinion.
The Constitution requires that a UNANIMOUS jury find a person guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt. That means all twelve people sitting on the
jury have to agree, together, that the person accused is, in fact, guilty.
If they don’t do this, they don’t do it. Twelve people have tried and
have told the judge that it is impossible, that more deliberations would
not get them anywhere: they are "hopelessly deadlocked." THIS IS NOT
A UNANIMOUS JURY: this is not a jury wherein all twelve people, selected
by both the prosecutor and the defense lawyer, found the accused guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt.
This should, in my opinion, be the beginning and the end of the story:
the jury should be thanked for their service, appreciated for their
honesty and their hard work and the person accused should be released
and the case against them dismissed. Instead, they are asked to try
again, to try harder, to go back into the jury room. They are told,
subtly and silently, that they have failed and to do better.
When there is a hung jury, the prosecutor gets to try again with a brand
new jury to see if they can convict the second time. The defense doesn’t
get the same courtesy: we don’t get to try the case again before a different
jury should our result be less than favorable the first go round.
I ask you, how is this constitutional?
|